Wednesday, November 5, 2008

75 degrees, Primary plus Fifteen, OBAMA

It continues to be Indian summer: blue skies without clouds, gentle breezes, embracing sunshine, mid-70s. I have been outside every day by the Indiana State Museum for practice (perhaps there are pictures of what I call "my field" online). Said field might also be part of White River State Park; in any case, it is 60 feet of grass in every direction, skyline visible north, river visible south. Concrete walkways, public art, architecture, autumnal trees, fantastic, really wonderful, beauty. So good for practice that it's unreal.

Outside practice rocks the earth; maybe because Swenson recommended it, I take it whenever I can, and in public is better for me than in the back yard (also, the back yard is terribly uneven, whereas publicly tended fields and parks tend not to be).

So today, with marvelous energy and lightness before I even rolled out the rug, I went out to my field (hah, MY field, as if it's named for me) and did Primary plus fifteen poses, which is Intermediate from Pasasana through Eka Pada Sirsasana. Occasionally Kapo seems to me to become a roadblock, which is not healthy either for me or for Kapo, and so I run past it, just to make sure that I know that it is "only a position" after all.

I held various poses for 10 breaths, to appreciate their wonder in stretching various parts of the glutes, specifically: Janu A and C, Marichyasana C and D.

Pasasana returned to a bind on both sides, ahhh.

Dhanurasana crept up, as one blogger put it to me long ago, "behind the heart," which was spooky but also pleasant to feel. Parsva Dhanurasana remains, as ever, intense in the hip flexors, but also deeply enjoyable. Even after a vinyasa, that pose remains so "loud" in me that it's often hard to tell exactly WHAT Ustrasana is supposed to stretch. I concentrate on thighs rotating in, tailbone under, ribs up, and head back; the backbend recipe.

Tough to come up from Laghu, but successful. Today I tried what I hear is Sharath's approach to teaching Kapo: drop back, straighten arms as much as possible, walk in, straighten, walk in, and so on. I cannot get my arms straight. When I walk them in, I also drop down, nearly to the top of my head. My bodymind's aim in Kapo is to let it GO and find Supta Virasana; the POSE's aim is to go both UP and FORWARD into Kapo. Fear, anxiety, panic. We expect this.

I think I will begin taking more breaths in Kapo; I know from backbending that more breaths is generally a deeper pose. It has to develop somehow, and without a teacher to fold me into it, I have to find a way, so more breaths, at the beginning, will simply be about experimenting with sensation, endurance and various ways of approaching the pose.

The only thing that keeps me from complaining about people who find Kapo easy (and really, how the flying hell is that even humanly POSSIBLE?) is that I find Mayurasana ridiculously simple, and really about nothing other than balance.

So I ran up to Eka Pada: the bound lotus backbend after Kapo is VERY hard to do solo. The twists which follow, however, are totally delicious; very glutes-oriented, and so, SO good.

Eka Pada itself has retreated some, as it will with my not doing it, but I was able to park the left leg behind the shoulder, which really took some pressure off the neck. I held the upright position for 5 breaths, then the fold for 5 breaths, and then exited, losing the LBH in both exits. But all in all, a fine pose. Much easier than Kapo.

Five wheels, with some slight walking in of hands, and then three big, intense hangs back, hands by hips, urging the hip flexors to release, the tailbone to drop, and the hang to increase. Ten breaths per hang back.

Classical closing, with 25 breaths in each inversion and a Siddhasana after coming up from rest.

Obama:

Have you seen the acceptance speech? All of the parallelisms, the cadence, the references to the age-old documents of famous American speeches? The total and overt refusal of partisanship and the so-Bush politics of divisiveness?

Did you feel a sort of odd, irresistible "promise" from all of this? I don't mean simply an emotional spell cast by the closing repetition of "Yes We Can."

Tom Wolfe (yes, THAT Tom Wolfe, author of the Tangerine Flake Baby and such) in 1994 spoke at Bloomington about America, and he said that he was going to take a Nietzschean line on whether or not America would "make it" as a nation, and he found that the nation is capable of a sort of regeneration, that it never QUITE settles into one mode, and thus can reinvent itself from any circumstances.

It's that same animal. I feel a strange opening between my private and public lives, with this election, not because we've broken any race barrier or because the Democrats took so many seats or any of that, but because in a way we have elected an official who is NOT playing Nixon's post-sixties reactionary culture war.

This culture war, the one that is still running anti-gay-marriage and abortion rights and social conservatism and all of that anti-reason ugliness as well as political correctness and that whole game? This is largely Nixon's doing (yes, I copped that from SICKO, but I trust Moore on this one point).

To have a politician NOT in any way shape or form, address the politics of culture war (which are the Bush politics EXTRAORDINAIRE) ONLY in terms of unity and in fact in terms of "America," the nation defined by a fluid democracy, and to have such an official talk about America in terms which include "humility," is mindbending stuff.

Obama is, and always has been, even when I was aware of him just as a Senator, had a very diplomatic, highly educated, well-reasoned public speaking presence. I first voted in 1988, and I've not, before, in 20 years, seen the US elect, on a certain level, such "intelligence." I don't mean rationality or some kind of anti-faith platform, I simply mean an intelligence not couched in "MY party, THEIR party," not disguised necessarily in terms of us and them.

I DON'T want my political leaders to "be like me"; I think that whole idea is totally bankrupt and self-deceiving. I want my leaders to be superior to me, better than I am at policy. On a certain level, I WANT a type of elitism, because if I thought I could run for President or be good at it, hell, I'd run myself.

There is a feeling of not just co-operation, but of downright healing, in the air. The Bush presidency, according to MANY people I've talked to, has been like living in an emotional war zone. A lot of people are crying today just spotaneously, from the release, the catharsis.

My own emotional stance for the last eight years has been something like that of the Heisman Trophy. See a link. Charging hard. In 2004 I covered my car with political stickers, out of outrage. It was either that or just start attacking people at random in the street and beating them senseless.

I feel, and for the past couple days, have felt, rage turning down in me, the levels lowering. While I still, for example, find the Proposition 8 business in California to be the new definition of narrow-minded fear-driven idiocy of the worst possible kind, I'm not angry about it, but simply sort of sighingly bored. Yes, let the social conservatives quiver in their fear and spend their money instituting policy which governs other people's rights in a way that doesn't affect those social conservatives at all. Sure. Whatever, dude.

In a certain way, social conservatives are fine. Republicans ever since the 1970s have been ramping up the fire under those people, intentionally stoking their fear into a political force. That's playing on the Dark Side and now, it seems, that table has turned.

Enough. Enough fear and ideological terrorism. Enough of Sarah Palin refusing to qualify Eric Rudolph as a terrorist (when he quite clearly is one). Enough paranoia, enough putting the sixties on trial. Enough, Republican party. Enough culture war. Enough damage to the nation. John Stewart called you on it way back in his legendary Tucker Carlson interview (and I went to school, for the record, with Tucker Carlson). "Stop...hurting...America."

So Yes We Can, couched not in Democratic terms, not in partisan terms, but in national terms, AS the national IDENTITY, is powerful magic. NOT let's conquer Europe or let's stomp the (whoever), but simply Tes We Can. Facing economic, social, political negativity, as well as personal negativity.

Two days ago I rolled up into Kukkutasana and locked my gaze on an American flag blowing in the wind and actually felt something. Potential, sort of.

I am reducing, as I'm able, the rage I feel, have felt. Just in case the personal really is political and the door between the two is wide open. The energy shall be good. Never, have I felt anything like this in an election. It's WEIRD. But I like it.

3 comments:

(0v0) said...

:)

Kukku under the red, white and blue?

Strange new images and ways of being.

I keep wanting to dial down the drama, but it's no use. This is big and I just have to begin realizing it. Soon the mood will change to urgency, but this a--you said it--healing moment.

Rev. Donald Spitz said...

Eric Rudolph is not a terrorist, but an anti-terrorist fighter. Those who have killed babykilling abortionists have done so to protect the innocent. People use force everyday to protect the innocent and no one has a problem with it, except when it comes to protecting unborn human beings, then they go ballistic. It's very simple, the unborn deserve the same protection as the born. Born people are protected with force quite often. Force that you would be glad if it was to protect your children against a murderer. Force that you yourself might use to protect your own children from being murdered. The unborn deserve the same protection.
SAY THIS PRAYER: Dear Jesus, I am a sinner and am headed to eternal hell because of my sins. I believe you died on the cross to take away my sins and to take me to heaven. Jesus, I ask you now to come into my heart and take away my sins and give me eternal life. http://www.ArmyofGod.com

patrick said...

Owl, YES, we'll be processing this as it goes, for some time.

And to the culture war spam which was posted after you, haha, here's what REAL freedom of speech means.

Now hear this, you fearmongering blind-to-context moral-majority quasi-logical spammer:

To the degree that ER (and before him, another hypocrite named Paul Hill) was defended by so-called "christians" for killing a human being, both he and they are hypocrites. The fifth commandment reads, in utterly unambiguous language, "THOU SHALT NOT KILL." What part of that do you not comprehend?

Ah, it's freedom-fighting, right? You and he were backed into a corner, right? It's the sixties all over again, except that this time instead of Malcolm X and the Panthers preaching armed resistance, it's the precious social conservatives who are "defending America," "defending the rights of the unborn," yes? You probably don't even know that history, but a careful rewriting of the sixties is from where your rhetoric comes.

Who masterminded this? Long, long rhetorical re-structuring, since the 1970s, by people preceding but also including Ralph Reed and Pat Robertson. The ACTUAL answer to the abortion controversy is intelligent application of birth control, and abstinence not as a political platform connected to one's "inner valuation of self" but as a Gandhian vow, a FULL and CONSCIOUS choice, not a manipulative self-identification driven by so-called christian desires for "purity" which is nothing but slang for intentional willful ignorance.

It has nothing to do with force and any kind of "rights," this is all deception and your own self-deception. This talk about "rights of the unborn" is all carefullly manipulated rhetoric developed particularly in the 1980s by careful and precise ideologues who wanted to carve "christians" into a voting block. In the 1980s you were called the "moral majority" and now you are, in fact, a voting block. You make up the base of the Bush presidency.

As such, by the way, you endorse, whether you think you do or not, things like the abandonment of habeas corpus, and torture of human beings. You also, to return to where this conversation started, neatly skip over what you claim as a Commandment, in order to support murderers.

What will you say to this? "The best defense is a good offense?" How can you possibly defend your hypocrisy? Oh, yes, that's right, you're "defending someone's rights," that's what you wrote, yes. Well that's nothing but manufactured ideology; you aren't the sixties, you aren't liberation, you aren't defense. You are a DUPE. You are a LIE. You are a hypocrite and an associate of MURDERERS.

You are, in a phrase, the Dark Side of American politics. You are the actual rhetorical manifestation of the politics of fear. Powercraving bureaucrats manufactured you, and you are nothing, NOTHING, but the deceived, unseeing, context-blind, unaware products of the effectiveness with which those powercraving bureaucrats have yoked your so-called belief actually and in real time to an agenda which is anti-human rights, pro-torture, pro-imperialism, and pro-murder.

In a way, I feel sad for you.

Take your Bible Literalism back to the Old Testament and reread your commandments.

THOU SHALT NOT KILL.

Do you know where Dante put the hypocrites? Deep, deep in the Inferno.

Wake up and reclaim a REAL faith, from this bureaucratic, fearmongering deception.

Christianity must reinvent itself from its utter and nearly total pollution by the radical right wing of the conservative party, or else it must do what is only right, and cease totally to exist.

Run the gauntlet; rediscover what is positive in that religion, or else cease totally to believe. Step into the existential oven and rediscover your ACTUAL self, not this shallow rhetoric of fear.

I leave your comment up ONLY so that others can witness your self-victimization and the full plenitude of your self-deception and ignorance.